Acting is fun. Playing a character is fun. That's one of the reasons i enjoy playing dungeons and dragons, it's not completely acting, but its setting yourself in the mindset of a created character, that is not your own.
In class i had to act as a homeless guy. It was okay with me, i was just acting in front of a few people i could possibly call friends. After that the professor said we could present it on a stage, i panicked a bit on the inside but ignored the comment. Later i filled in the space for another group's mini play, which was fun, i didn't have to know my lines just act them out and the character was a dick so it was fun to play. I thought i was done with this.
Some classes afterwards I learned i had to do the same thing i had done on a stage. OH BOY. Oh no. I couldn't escape. My crappy acting skills will be shown for other people to see. I hoped no one will go so they would think of me as "that guy that played the homeless guy" when they see me around. I hoped i could get out somehow, because it was stressing me out just to think that i would have to act in front of people. I absolutely adore acting silly but i never do it much if i dont trust or know the person, and just having to act serious in front of a crowd shook me. In the end it all went well, no one actually cared, i bet everyone that went didn't have much else to do, and they probably understood how i felt, so i was ok with the outcome.
Final thoughts: Holy crap i thought i wouldnt come out alright but i did, somehow. 2/10 would not do again.
Let's Think About it
Tuesday, May 5, 2015
Let's think about DM-ing
The DM, the Dungeon Master, is the person that controls a Dungeons and Dragons game(there are other definitions and games, but im gonna go with this one).
Recently, in this last year, i have accomplished what i believe to be a geek goal of the highest caliber, I began playing Dungeons and Dragons(D&D). D&D is a game where a DM makes a world and a situation, including characters and battles, and the Players create Characters(called Player characters, or PC's ) to go on an adventure in this world and meet the DM's world and Characters(this time Non-playable Characters, or NPC's).
After a while of playing, I showed it to some of my friends and I became their DM in a game we decided to play. This is such an amazing chance, but it has so many things to do. What I love the most and have trouble with DMing is world building. I have created a new world and created it's towns, but not how they look like and I'm missing it's lore.
Sure the people of Bolkos are peaceful people that escaped the war, but what was that war about? Who fought who? Sure Kelos is a merchant community, but what does it look like? who lives and works there? What are the Dwarven communities called and what do they mine?
DMing is a hard job but it's great to see players enjoy the world.
Final thoughts: i enjoy this process a lot, even if i am just a beginner and i hope i can finish this game.
Monday, May 4, 2015
Let's think of Serving in Silence
1. Describe these reactions:
A. Military: Not acceptable;immoral;condemned in military regulation.
B. Father: Doesn't accept it, even when he does he wants it to be a secret.
C. Children Each Son (s):Big three are ok, but the youngest is in denial.
2. Margarethe's decision to tell
A. the military :Just popped during an evaluation
B. her children :has to tell them because of a potential lawsuit.
C. her father: tell her father before confrontation.
3. What is your reaction to this true story? Do you believe that she should have kept her secret or told it to everyone? Explain your reasons why.
I very much enjoyed this story. I should have looked for more information on it but from what I saw, the story was good. After thinking on it for a while, I noticed it’s time frame. I’ve had a few homosexual friends and they’ve had problems coming out in our time, this happened before I was even born. One must be amazingly lucky to have such an accepting group of family and friends to support you if you go through something like this. I don’t think there’s a right answer to that question, it’s really about how one feels. As she said she wasn’t hiding it, she was just, not exposing it all the time, it’s her relationships, she does what she wants, and what she feels is right.
5. How would Dr. Kinsey explain the Margarethe Cammermeyer's sexuality?
She is a mother of 4 boys so how can she be lesbian? Is it her choice?
I'm not sure. We had a debate and we classified her in different parts of his scale, but always on the homosexual part. If she identifies as a lesbian then she is. And possibly she didn't know until she fell in love. It's not her choice, its who she is.
6.What does Margarethe believe about her sexuality as it relates to her identity?
It doesn't change who she is, it's just Part of who she is.
A. Military: Not acceptable;immoral;condemned in military regulation.
B. Father: Doesn't accept it, even when he does he wants it to be a secret.
C. Children Each Son (s):Big three are ok, but the youngest is in denial.
2. Margarethe's decision to tell
A. the military :Just popped during an evaluation
B. her children :has to tell them because of a potential lawsuit.
C. her father: tell her father before confrontation.
3. What is your reaction to this true story? Do you believe that she should have kept her secret or told it to everyone? Explain your reasons why.
I very much enjoyed this story. I should have looked for more information on it but from what I saw, the story was good. After thinking on it for a while, I noticed it’s time frame. I’ve had a few homosexual friends and they’ve had problems coming out in our time, this happened before I was even born. One must be amazingly lucky to have such an accepting group of family and friends to support you if you go through something like this. I don’t think there’s a right answer to that question, it’s really about how one feels. As she said she wasn’t hiding it, she was just, not exposing it all the time, it’s her relationships, she does what she wants, and what she feels is right.
5. How would Dr. Kinsey explain the Margarethe Cammermeyer's sexuality?
She is a mother of 4 boys so how can she be lesbian? Is it her choice?
I'm not sure. We had a debate and we classified her in different parts of his scale, but always on the homosexual part. If she identifies as a lesbian then she is. And possibly she didn't know until she fell in love. It's not her choice, its who she is.
6.What does Margarethe believe about her sexuality as it relates to her identity?
It doesn't change who she is, it's just Part of who she is.
Let's think about Group work
I have to say, of all the group
work I have done throughout the years, I think this has been some of the most
successful one. Sure there’s always some
people doing a bit more than others, but this time we all separated work
equally and worked together. It was kind
of weird at first, actually, it was weird all over. Having to act, discuss and comment on each
other’s blogs is weird, but it opens up good discussion. Last class we had a good discussion about
lying to one self and the movie we watched, although it seem a bit harsh at a
moment, I think we need more of this type of discussion, as long as everyone is
respectful of others and accepts to some terms like hearing each other out and
not blocking their minds to what the other is saying.
Final thought's: 8/10, i wish i wouldn't need to have to do more group work but i know i will.
Wednesday, April 29, 2015
Let' think about this blog
"Let's think about thinking about things."-Me, when I was thinking of what gimmick
The main idea for this blog was to be like a critic and try to have some fun with analyzing what i had to discuss from class. I have to say, it ended being funner than i expected, but it still runs with the "since i was told to do it, I'm not going to enjoy it" syndrome, but hey, that telling me to do it made me start, and actually enjoy myself a bit, here I am writing my 10th blog post, I don't think I will write many more, but I can say I like those that are already written. After 10 blog posts around 300 to 600 words each, I can say I am still as lost and entertained by this as when I started.to go with for the blog.
When I started I had no idea how a blog should be written, but I did know one thing, I knew what I liked, and what I would read, so I decided I would write and make my blog just that. It worked for me, talking about things I had seen as reviews and how I felt towards them, this didn't start as well but after a few posts, maybe because i had gotten a bit used to this, or because I was tired when writing the posts, but I began to write with a more honest(and sarcastic) tone which gave more life to my posts. I think what i enjoyed most of my post was the final thoughts, and those have always been that, honest thoughts. An example of this is my favorite post: Let's think about the 60's , It's informational about what the movie is, but it is shown in a sarcastic and possibly angry tone with how they were presented. It show's my real reaction towards some aspects I wanted to point out, which in a blog, I can.
This was what differed from here and my journal. In my journal I organized thoughts by sprawling every little thing on paper with no thinking. It was just a jumbled mess of words and whining with no purpose except being, but here I get to share my thoughts, when they're better organized, and that's what made this experience easier, and better for me. The one thing I did not enjoy having to do in the blog experience was to comment on every of my groups blog posts, and I couldn't just comment it had to be some weird way of commenting (brought to you by Peter Elbow) because I don't necessarily have a consistent thought about everything, maybe i just liked a line or liked the post in general, I still need to comment something and this opens up vague comments most of the people are probably going to ignore because in the end, we all know it's for the grade and if someone actually cares about something they comment its going to get shrugged off "Oh hey look, everyone in my group commented, good" it makes it lack the purpose it originally had, which is sad because I liked the idea of commenting, but not to those extremes of in every post, in a certain way, I felt like it took away personality which is what makes this great.
Final thoughts: 9/10 even though i don't think this will change my way of writing in the future, maybe I could write here from time to time. If you wanna try doing this, go ahead, i don't think you're going to regret it if you do it freely.
Tuesday, April 28, 2015
Let's think about Trifles
"Well, women are used to worrying over trifles."
Trifles, something simple, something that doesn't matter... like the fact that the case you're investigating is a homicide not suicide.
Trifles is the story of an investigation of what seems like a suicide by a farmer and how the police investigate it. Well, that's what it seems like at first, but after a while the attention shifts to the women that were with them, and it shows them conducting their own investigation. At one point one of the men says the line that i wrote at the beginning of the post, and then you know they, the men, are going to be the ones worrying over "trifles". The women find out by observing knitting patterns and remembering how the people involved in the case were, that it was actually a murder and that the farmer's wife had been practicing a noose knot with her yarn, this is proved when they see her bird tied to a tiny noose. At the end, what still baffles me a bit is that the women didn't share what they had learned, personally i would like to prove those that think i don't matter wrong, but that wasn't their mindset.
This story is great. We see how men ignore women and they just get back without even letting them know it. They found out all the details of a case they just decided was a suicide. I'm not sure what else to say about it. I enjoyed it but just once, it didn't have much of a reread feeling. The story was ok, a bit predictable but its nice. I wish we could see consequences to them keeping the info.
Final Thoughts: Anyone that hasn't read it. should read it, I am sorry to spoil the good parts, but i didn't give any important information of the story. 6/10 wont read again.
Trifles, something simple, something that doesn't matter... like the fact that the case you're investigating is a homicide not suicide.
Trifles is the story of an investigation of what seems like a suicide by a farmer and how the police investigate it. Well, that's what it seems like at first, but after a while the attention shifts to the women that were with them, and it shows them conducting their own investigation. At one point one of the men says the line that i wrote at the beginning of the post, and then you know they, the men, are going to be the ones worrying over "trifles". The women find out by observing knitting patterns and remembering how the people involved in the case were, that it was actually a murder and that the farmer's wife had been practicing a noose knot with her yarn, this is proved when they see her bird tied to a tiny noose. At the end, what still baffles me a bit is that the women didn't share what they had learned, personally i would like to prove those that think i don't matter wrong, but that wasn't their mindset.
This story is great. We see how men ignore women and they just get back without even letting them know it. They found out all the details of a case they just decided was a suicide. I'm not sure what else to say about it. I enjoyed it but just once, it didn't have much of a reread feeling. The story was ok, a bit predictable but its nice. I wish we could see consequences to them keeping the info.
Final Thoughts: Anyone that hasn't read it. should read it, I am sorry to spoil the good parts, but i didn't give any important information of the story. 6/10 wont read again.
Monday, April 27, 2015
Let's think about the 60's part 2
This is the story of a beautiful perfect white picket fence family with two boys and a girl, the oldest is about to get scholarship and what can go wrong. Well, a lot, depending on your beliefs. The oldest son Brian lost his scholarship and decided to join the marines without knowing what it was (he says he thought it was more football, showing how little the people knew about the war), the middle child Michael starts going into movements and peace keeping, and the youngest, Katie, accepts everyone and she got pregnant and her dad threw a hissy fit and she couldn't handle it and left.
What are we left with? A PTSD Brian, always drinking and smoking. A Michael looking for a better future but looking at the girl from his past. Katie as a mother, ran away from home and raising little Rainbow in a "could be worse" scenario.
Here we see the main source of discrimination at what seems like the core, the family. Most of these problems can be tuned to one source, their father, Brian felt like he needed to prove himself and since the father had been in the marines, he also joined to make him proud, Michael's problem at a point was he had to leave home because of his different opinions that clashed with his conservative father, and poor Katie had to leave because how her dad made her feel at her weakest points. We see how conservatives of these times were okay with the war and against change, they couldn't even accept some of their loved ones because of these beliefs.
But something that happens at the end shows how we progressed. The fact that change is possible, and acceptance is key.
Final thoughts: I want to get more into the characters but i think it is better to watch it, if you haven't give it a try. Also: obvious love interest is obvious, but that wasn't the point of the story, it was showing this period, and it did so.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)